AI can dramatically accelerate legal research and drafting, but the attorney signing the filing remains responsible for the accuracy of the work.
As courts encounter more AI-generated citations that do not exist or do not support the proposition claimed, lawyers need a clear process for verification, correction, and response. This complimentary guide examines how courts are handling AI hallucinations and what attorneys can do to protect their clients, their cases, and their professional responsibilities.
Download the complimentary guide to learn:
What to do if you discover an AI hallucination after filing and why promptly correcting the record matters
How courts are responding to hallucinated citations, including the factors that can make sanctions more severe
Why taking responsibility can make a significant difference in how courts respond to an AI-related mistake
What judges increasingly expect from law firms, including AI policies, verification procedures, and appropriate supervision
How to respond when opposing counsel files hallucinated citations without unnecessarily derailing the underlying litigation
How to build a verification process that helps catch inaccurate citations before they reach the court
The guide also examines real-world examples of attorneys facing hallucinated citations and the lessons firms can take from how those situations were handled.
Complete the form to download AI Hallucinations in Court and learn how to identify, prevent, and respond to AI-generated citation errors in legal filings.
Clio and Clio Affiliates may contact you with relevant content, products, and services. You can unsubscribe at any time. Learn more in Clio's Privacy Notice.
